fail - measured over 16015 pixels carrying ink in either image.
These results are not meaningful. This check renders a single static frame, and nothing in a test document records which moment in time its reference image was captured at - so a correct SMIL implementation and a broken one are equally likely to mismatch. Animation behaviour is covered by dedicated unit tests instead; see ctgnz/foxglove#208 for a real measurement methodology, still to be worked out.
W3C reference (context only, see #200)
Foxglove
Difference
In the difference panel, red marks pixels that
differ beyond tolerance and grey marks matching content. The tinted band, where present, is the
<text id="revision"> legend every test carries: it renders in a fallback font this
library cannot match, so it is excluded from the comparison entirely rather than failing every test.
What this test checks
The six orange rectangles should simultaneously animate their widths so that their right edges line up with the ruler lines at the indicated time. From time 0 - 2 seconds all rectangles should have their right edges lined up with the leftmost ruler line, and at time 2 seconds the animation should start, changing the widths of all the rectangles from 30 to 300. At time 5 seconds the animation should stop and the rectangles should all line up with the rightmost ruler line.
