fonts-desc-05-t

83.1% of the ink matches
pass - measured over 13697 pixels carrying ink in either image.

W3C reference (context only, see #200)

W3C reference (context only, see #200)

Foxglove

Foxglove

Difference

Difference
In the difference panel, red marks pixels that differ beyond tolerance and grey marks matching content. The tinted band, where present, is the <text id="revision"> legend every test carries: it renders in a fallback font this library cannot match, so it is excluded from the comparison entirely rather than failing every test.

What this test checks

The correct result for the first line is diamond, diamond, upward-triangle, downard-triangle. The correct result for the second line is upward-triangle, downard triangle, and a right-triangle. Reasoning for glyphs on the first line: The first character is a diamond because it is matched purely on the font-style attribute. The second character is a diamond because font-style (italic) is of highest precedence, followed by font-variant (normal), then font-weight (bold). The third character matches upward-triangle because again font-variant (small-caps) is a higher precedence than font-weight. The fourth character undisputedly matches the downward-triangle. Reasoning for the glyphs on the second line: The first character is a upward-triangle because the font matching must fall back to SVGFont1 to get a match for small-caps. The second character is a downward-triangle because there is no match for small-caps in SVGFont2. The third character is a right facing triangle because italic should match oblique in SVGFont2.

View the source document at W3C