interact-pevents-04-t

25.7% of the ink matches
fail - measured over 13205 pixels carrying ink in either image.
These results are not meaningful, by design. This test's pass criteria require scripted or user-driven interaction (a click, a DOM call) that foxglove itself never supplies - foxglove renders SVG into JavaFX Nodes, and interaction is the consuming application's responsibility, not this library's. This category is expected to remain near 0% permanently; see ctgnz/foxglove#201.

W3C reference (context only, see #200)

W3C reference (context only, see #200)

Foxglove

Foxglove

Difference

Difference
In the difference panel, red marks pixels that differ beyond tolerance and grey marks matching content. The tinted band, where present, is the <text id="revision"> legend every test carries: it renders in a fallback font this library cannot match, so it is excluded from the comparison entirely rather than failing every test.

What this test checks

The first two lines must behave the same way, and must turn green only when a glyph is hovered, note that this includes the space glyph which covers about half the distance between each pair of the other glyphs. The third line must turn green only when hovering each of the visible glyphs, not the whitespace. The fourth line must turn green only when a glyph is hovered, note that this includes the space glyph which covers about half the distance between each pair of the other glyphs. The fifth line must turn green only when hovering each of the visible glyphs, not the whitespace.

View the source document at W3C