struct-cond-03-t

51.0% of the ink matches
fail - measured over 111396 pixels carrying ink in either image.

W3C reference (context only, see #200)

W3C reference (context only, see #200)

Foxglove

Foxglove

Difference

Difference
In the difference panel, red marks pixels that differ beyond tolerance and grey marks matching content. The tinted band, where present, is the <text id="revision"> legend every test carries: it renders in a fallback font this library cannot match, so it is excluded from the comparison entirely rather than failing every test.

What this test checks

On the bottom half of the test, there is a first switch. Because SVG Tiny does not support DOM, an SVG Tiny implementation which does not support other SVG Profiles should show a green rectangle. If the application supports the DOM, meaning that it does more than just SVG Tiny, it should show a turquoise rectangle. On the bottom half of the test, there is another switch. The first child has a requiredFeatures set to http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/feature#BasicText which all SVG Tiny implementations should support. If the application does, another green rectangle is displayed. Otherwise, a red rectangle shows.

View the source document at W3C