text-intro-01-t

29.4% of the ink matches
fail - measured over 15701 pixels carrying ink in either image.

W3C reference (context only, see #200)

W3C reference (context only, see #200)

Foxglove

Foxglove

Difference

Difference
In the difference panel, red marks pixels that differ beyond tolerance and grey marks matching content. The tinted band, where present, is the <text id="revision"> legend every test carries: it renders in a fallback font this library cannot match, so it is excluded from the comparison entirely rather than failing every test.

What this test checks

Correct rendering requires that each character is rendered. It may be rendered with the 'missing glyph' if no glyphs are found in the fonts listed in the content, or in any fallback font that is available. The first choice font is a special SVG font that only contains the 'missing glyph'. Missing glyph from other fonts may conformantly be used, however. The test is passed if the lines of text appear as follows: Polish: Mogę jeść szkło, i mi ... Russian: Я могу есть стекло, ... Greek: Μπορώ να φάω ... Hebrew: אני יכול לאכול זכוכית ... Yiddish: איך קען עסן גלאָז און ... Chinese:我能吞下玻璃而不伤身体。 Japanese: 私はガラスを食べます。

View the source document at W3C