fail - measured over 15221 pixels carrying ink in either image.
These results are not meaningful, by design. This test's pass criteria require scripted or user-driven interaction (a click, a DOM call) that foxglove itself never supplies - foxglove renders SVG into JavaFX Nodes, and interaction is the consuming application's responsibility, not this library's. This category is expected to remain near 0% permanently; see ctgnz/foxglove#201.
W3C reference (context only, see #200)
Foxglove
Difference
In the difference panel, red marks pixels that
differ beyond tolerance and grey marks matching content. The tinted band, where present, is the
<text id="revision"> legend every test carries: it renders in a fallback font this
library cannot match, so it is excluded from the comparison entirely rather than failing every test.
What this test checks
For the test to pass, the values generated by script must match the values provided in the png image. The correct values are: .getScreenCTM() for id "rotText": 0.42,0.42,-0.42,0.42,70.00,-60.00 .getCTM() for id "rotText": 0.42,0.42,-0.42,0.42,70.00,-60.00 .getTransformToElement() between id "rotText" and id "parentGroup": 0.42,0.42,-0.42,0.42,0.00,0.00 .getBBox() for 'blueCircle': .x=-50,.y=-50,.width=100,.height=100 .farthestViewportElement of blueCircle=svg-root .nearestViewportElement of blueCircle=nestedSVG
